I do, especially with rock music. The instruments sound horrible if it's less than 192Kbps.

HQ 320kbps+ for me when talkin about my favorite artists

all my stuff is 320kbps

Usually 320kbps or iTunes Plus. Recently i've been getting FLAC just because of my Beats by Dr Dre.

hm...at least 256kbps for me. And I use BOSE in-ear earphones...they are fantastic.

256kbps iTunes plus for me.
I don't really notice a difference between said bit rate and 320kbps.
Although I lean towards the iTunes plus.

lmfao "I love LQ music! 128kbps and below please!" this sounds so funny :haha

HQ for me.

Only for my favorite artists.

HQ320

If it's a song I can only find in 128, it'll do, but the second there's a better version - BING :D

exactly this XP

I need it in HQ quality or I won't really listen to it until a better quality comes out.

HQ 320kbps+ for me!

Got to be at least 320kbps for me! :) Pain in the butt for the space it takes up but I can tell the difference if its lower xD

Actually, I have my whole music collection (1771+ songs) in ALAC, strictly checked for quality (no transcodes at any costs), and if there are singles/albums I love that are not available in lossless quality (considering I'm saving my money to purchase something else), I can settle for either 320 kbps mp3, or anything but below 192 AAC.

It's not like I even have the best headphones out there or the best system to listen to music on but I always want to know that if I'm listening to something, it's in best quality it can be.

I do care a lot, at least I want songs in 320kbps, I always rip my music in lossless format

I don't care..

Only HQ I don't like low quality it makes a song worse.

Low quality files literally hurt my ears, especially if the song is originally loud (like hard rock for example). HQ files all the way. Unless I can't find a HQ version of the song, then low quality is better than nothing.

Poor quality music results in profuse EAR BLOOD.