Quote:
Originally Posted by emiko
I didn't exactly mean that she is the only one working. What I meant by my obviously sarcastic post, is that this "article" is just bull. And to be honest, if ayu wants to bring her dogs to work, then she can bring her dogs to work. They might calm her down, they might make her feel better. Whatever the reason, I really don't care. Ayu isn't going to produce any less quality of music because her dogs are there, it is absolutely irrelevant, as you said.
Because this is a tabloid, and they were completely unprofessional, I refuse to acknowledge their point. I will possibly listen to it if, they provide clear evidence that her dogs are actually disruptive and it somehow affects her music, until then, this article is worse than crap. At least other tabloids funny. This one was just horribly written and...it's just...smut.
|
LOL it's really funny! A thread about "how to make a tabloid" should be created because they always follow a very very simillar structure. They usually begin "kinda" informative and positive in the first paragraph:
"JPOP star ayumi hamasaki who broke the record of selling x million records..."
The second paragraoph, they decide to clash ayu with somebody else, in a rather mild way:
"koda kumi, who surpassed ayu the past years on total record sales, blah, blah"
In the third paragraph they put some really random uncofirmed fact that will have a negative overtone:
"ayu treating her dogs like kings, being egoistical with the flight seats..."
LOL There we go, our tabloid is ready (and HOT) to be released
They usually use the last paragraph to sting fiercely because:
-fans won't get annoyed when reading the first paragraphs and end up reading the whole thing, so they get their point accross that way.
-conclusions are supposed to be in the end of every article. With them putting the negative information as the conclusion, ends up making that part (the end of the reading) to stick much more into the readers mind.