Quote:
Originally Posted by koda♥
Wait, so the point of a forum is posting...
Just because one post is in reply to the other, that makes it spam?
Even if it -is- on topic?
I honestly don't see the point of making a thread if your not allowed to post when the things are relevant to the artist in name.
And almost all the post are spaced out between with 3-10 minutes between each, with three 1 minutes, and one double post..
Isn't that considered normal on most forums?
Sorry if I sound rude, but I want to know exactly where the boundaries lye because I didn't read anything against that in the rules @.@
|
Being on topic doesn't make it spam. However the latest koda kumi threads have been spammy,, and it's undeniable. I know the last one wasn't at all that much spammy, but it got really spammy in the end. As cory mentioned, the last page on that thread is crowded with spam. Also, just because you mentioned the name koda kumi in as koda related thread doesn't necessarily mean that post isn't spam. If the post is empty like "Oh these kuu threads are boring without *insert name*", then it's spam.
The koda kumi threads are being targeted because it was obvious people were spamming there for several reason (i.e reaching 500 posts limits so new threads would be open until the 30th was reached to make a sexual connotation title). That's really immature.