Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Punks
Likewise, I could say that members' opinions have nothing to do with the quality of the album. Members probably tend to like (m)u more because it's newer and more "poppy" than Duty. I'd say Japanese fans' opinions are more important than ours anyways, since... they're the ones who buy 20345902349052 of her albums depending on if they're good or not.
|
Quality IS opinion based. There are no set standards for quality, like "x amount of instruments * x song length * x time of vocals" or something.
And actually from what I read people tend to NOT like her more poppy songs. glitter, fairyland and BLUE BIRD are pretty hated around here. At least when glitter came around everyone was all omg not ANOTHER one. :p And I am... is old but still ranked very high.
Quote:
Originally Posted by extepan
i agree. a lot of opinions do not make it a fact.
anyway, recent albums or songs always do better in polls because they are fresh in the minds of voters. it's called recency effect.
|
Make what fact? I was saying that it's fact that a lot more people 'round here like (m)u more than Duty, to someone who said that her quality kept going down or something (heck, I even forgot what the initial post was about lol it's that unimportant
).
As for the recency effect, m(u) is too old for that effect still, really. You'll have to look at GUILTY~NEXT LEVEL for that. MA and I am... both ranked very high, and those are way old.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbrat2219
Amen to that! Our opinions are just as valuable. Japanese people may put sales on Oricon, but we're putting money into what we feel is a good product as well, so...  |
Amen.