That's such an odd review... Can that be called a review?! Really?!
This person obviously didn't listen to the album very well. How is it really possible that those two songs seemed to be the only ones that stood out to her?
To be honest, I think the 'review' just lacked space in the magazine and she just had to cut things horribly short. Did an awful job of it too to be honest. Yes, the album did have a lot of what could be considered ballads, and is it possible none of those stood out to her?
Man, these people don't really take the time to listen to something properly, surely.
Edit: Based on your review for the album, Karen, you should be the one writing music reviews for magazines. I found your review made sense and was fair.
Last edited by AngelSenshi; 21st May 2010 at 11:39 AM.
|