um okay people.
@Edge: Well I was talking about the Vogue cover...which...is a Vogue cover. It's not going to define her whole era...most likely because, they usually style people for their covers themselves. And if it does, then I'm sorry you'll all be disappointed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingdom
etc... being on the cover of vogue does not mean you're supposed to look ugly as sin with a ill fitting wig and blue/purple/WTF lipstick. lol
|
No, but being on the cover of Vogue, means she isn't going to do some cutesy crap like her old style with the bow on her head, or even the artistic weird stuff.
In any case, I don't think she looks that bad, I think she looks typical of that style.
I do think she needs a new look though...but it's not going to happen here in this mag lol