Quote:
Originally Posted by artcika
oh guys, you obviously don't understand the point of ART these days...  *irony that was*
honestly? I kind of like it and I'm not even a fan of her... the cover isn't pretty, yes, it's odd, yes, but I'd rather see something like that than some blegh beauty shot. and why isn't it inovative? Did you see someone turning themselves into a motorcycle cyborg for a cover? I didn't....
I do agree though that her single cover was really WOW they should have used that instead. But I do like the egyness of the black and white and the wild apperance of hers, messy.
double honestly? yes it is a little stupid, but this still falls bechind the egg thing she did for grammys...  I thought that was the stupidest thing that anyone could have think of... |
Just because its art doesn't mean we have to like it. I personally, would have preferred a beauty shot. Covers can be pretty and edgy/wild too, imo. To me, she just looks like she rolled out of bed.