Quote:
Originally Posted by artcika
IMAGINATION? LOL those covers have zero of imagination, it's pure stereotypical cheap sexyness. I wouldn't call it trashy because of how much she's wearing it's about how it's portrayed: they did a crappy job with set it totally looks like some cheap AV modeling studio, i don't even know where to actually settle my eyes on. Not even mentioning the compossition and design itself IMO and with that leopard print it's like the tackyest part of it all! Let alone those hooker heels & that pose.... it's like... i don't even wanna start explaining that....
|
I was referring to those people who don't think the Duty covers are "trashy."
I see everyone's point about the covers, I really do. It's the people that act like Ayu doesn't sell sex that I find to be annoying and contradicting. Have y'all seen her "idol" pictures before she started singing? They're much more sexually explicit than these photos merely because of the symbolism and the suggestive nature of the photos. People act shocked every time Ayu does something "new", but this is really nothing new. She's been doing this for years... just with different executions. Ayu's image is more Madonna than Tori Amos... always has been. These photos aren't even on the level of Kesha... more like a FHM/Maxim shoot. Big deal.