Quote:
Originally Posted by Chibi-Chan
And honestly, what would have been the problem by just asking AyuAngel or the other people if it's ok for Ayu's team to use their ideas? I'm pretty sure none of them would have said no. And it would have been great marketing if Ayu would have made a single little post or whatever saying they she liked the work of a fan that much that they asked and now use it. It would have been the work of a few minutes to write one simple email to those people. But they didn't even bothered to do that.
|
Absolutly!
As I say in my previous message, it's not about money of course, it's about
principle, I think nobody want request a contract or money from avex, it would be ridiculous, (the "A" mark or picture belong to avex, they let us use them, and they turn a blind eyes about a lot of not really legal stuff)
Ayumi and all her work are the inspiration of fan art , and then her team takes fan art as inspiration, well, that's a good exchange!
but why avex doesn't write "logo inspired by *put your name here* stuff"? it's not a big deal
that's a little bit disrespectful to do as if nothing had happened, especially when it's so obvious and repeated (3 times in one year, well...they want a new graphic designers team? I think they are a lot of candidates here =D )
Well, but we should stay humble too, even if sometimes it's so exciting haha
at the end what remains is that I was happy, really, and I hope that Ayu will use some of my graphics, for her twitter or anything else, in the future =)
(unfortunately my clients don't care about the argument "Did you realize that Ayumi Hamasaki love my work?!" haha)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chibi-Chan
AyuAngel also mentioned that she's in real life a graphic designer, that means people took the work of an actual graphic designer and get paid for a job they should have done. I don't know how AyuAngel thinks about it but I think it's simply wrong.
|
it may be the only point that bothers me when I think of her lazy (and probably really good) graphic team that violates this important principle in the field.
Well, it's a interesting and complex debate !