WTF... - Page 3

**Corybobory** · #1 4th May 2008, 03:42 AM

You roll your eyes as if it's a strange rule

Partino · #2 4th May 2008, 03:50 AM

^it's just that this whole discussion is getting a lil out of hand ... there's nothing in his sig what you wouldn't see at ... hmm ... the BEACH?!?!?! .. it's not like she's full frontal naked and rubbing ... well ... something ...let's say HUSTLER style ...

EDIT: DON'T GET ME WRONG ON THIS!!!! XXX and stuff alike on AHS is not appropriate, but this sig?!?! come on!!!

#3 4th May 2008, 04:21 AM

^
I agree. Just imagine Kuu to be sunbathing. She's not doing anything inappropriate in the sig at all, she's just lounging around with a microphone.

pommy48 · #4 4th May 2008, 04:23 AM

wow such a heated discussion in the FAQ section...most people change their sigs a lot, it's not like fanmail is going to stick with that sig forever...just change it...

Partino · #5 4th May 2008, 04:44 AM

^well ... he should ... but the reason is like ... BLEH!!!

truehappiness · #6 4th May 2008, 07:15 AM

She's naked in a few 12 singles PVs, right?

Oh well, whatever. Who really cares, right?

AyuHamasaki01 · #7 4th May 2008, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImpactBreaker

There's one kanariya making of clip that I believe was prohibited here once because it shows ayu opening her legs and showing the view from the lower parts and apparently she seems to be without underwear and you can sort of vaguely see something else

I have to see that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KaoriNeko

Yeah, that was me. I'm not sure who it was, but someone did have a problem with it. Now my cousin is using the set and I don't think she's had problems with it.

But with the whole naked butt thing...it isn't a naked butt. It's a profile. We don't see any nipples or butt crack so how can it be offensive? Ayu is showing us plenty of cleavage on the Mirrorcle World covers but that isn't against the rules...

LOL, show the avi to me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by truehappiness

She's naked in a few 12 singles PVs, right?

Oh well, whatever. Who really cares, right?

You didn't see anything fun, if you mean that.

**Halla** · #8 5th May 2008, 10:18 AM

I'm pretty sure that Kanariya making-of clip is just people imagining seeing something there because of the video quality, I don't think official video like that would get past the screeners or whatever when they're producing it.

I personally don't think any of koda kumi's or other j-pop singers photoshoots or whatever are too risque for AHS in the appropriate place, but people should take into consideration what they put in their sigs because some people don't want to see that & that's ok.
if you see an Ayu sig that you feel is inappropriate, feel free to report it.

and IMO LOVEppears cover is not sexy or suggestive, nudity does not always equal sexy.

KuroixShiroi_Namida · #9 5th May 2008, 10:25 AM

The LOVEppears cover imo is not attractive at all

***ImpactBreaker*** · #10 4th May 2008, 05:28 PM

Oh well, signature finally removed (compulsorily) for good

fanmail · #11 4th May 2008, 08:27 PM

Well, that's not fair. The LOVEppears or Mirrorcle World covers are just as suggestive. You can't even SEE anything on that Koda picture.

Wow, an outline.

*shock! horror! call the cops for indecent exposure!!*

It's not like she was opening her crack to us.

Besides, I'm sure the members here have seen worse than the outline of a body. Ugh.

#12 4th May 2008, 08:39 PM

^
I agree. But apparently it's inappropriate even though there's thousands of sets with Ayu's cleavage floating around. >,>

qwerty · #13 4th May 2008, 08:49 PM

I think the sig is pretty inappropriate because you can basically see an entire side of her body. Ayu at least covers most of her body on the LOVEppears cover, whether she does it with clothes or with her hair. Kumi is essentially exposing one of her butt cheeks and most of her body.

Piccolo · #14 4th May 2008, 09:08 PM

We have a lot of whiners here. If the staff asks you to change your signature, something VERY simple to do, you should just comply. The initiates here don't get to interpret rules to their own liking.

fanmail · #15 4th May 2008, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piccolo

We have a lot of whiners here. If the staff asks you to change your signature, something VERY simple to do, you should just comply. The initiates here don't get to interpret rules to their own liking.

I don't know if you read this thread or not, but that's not what it was originally about..

**milky_way** · #16 4th May 2008, 09:14 PM

I can't believe a picture is causing this much wank from both sides

**Corybobory** · #17 4th May 2008, 09:30 PM

Maybe he just meant it as a general truth, since it's generally true.

fanmail · #18 4th May 2008, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Corybobory

Maybe he just meant it as a general truth, since it's generally true.

Oh, well maybe. But it just sounded like it was directed at me.

**Corybobory** · #19 4th May 2008, 11:12 PM

Well, you were asked to remove your sig, and you didn't...

emi♡ · #20 5th May 2008, 01:15 AM

It is a general truth. It probably was directed at you. Next time just remove it.

As in regards to what is allowed and what isn't, the mods obviously discuss these things, and when they decide something is inappropriate, it's inappropriate and that's it.

It isn't really a big deal. If someone has THAT big a problem with not being allowed to show certain pictures, then they can leave and post them somewhere else.