WTF...

[ImpactBreaker]

Originally Posted by bondingo

I'm speaking in defense of fanmail's sig as well, because honestly, I think people are being quite prudish. I don't think she's being oertly sexual in it, and there is nothing you can actually see. It is suggestive, sure, but you don't actually see her entire ass. It's like the cover to LOVEppears: nothing can actually be seen fully, but part of her breasts can be seen and that isn't considered by the staff to be offensive.

The LOVEppears cover can't even be compared to that. Ayu at least is wearing jeans, and the hair covering her breasts isn't really any different from wearing a bikini there, both have a simillar effect even though you can deduce ayu's topless. Koda is completely naked on that picture - and you can see far more breast and butt crack than you can see in LOVEppears / Mirrorcle World / UNITE! / RAINBOW. It's my personal opinion what I'll say now but, in LOVEppears ayu looks more like a fashion model, in that ku''s picture she looks more like she's promoting porn.

Also, if such a signature like that is accepted, it's not long before some members will bring avatars with naked porn actors touching their crotches with pictures cut a few milimiters before we can see their genitals (some even showing pubic hair), trying to stretch the staff tolerance as much as they can. I'm speaking from experience, because this has truly happened here. It's just what many, and I'm not kidding, initiates have done in the past, started with something mildly risque and progressed to worse and worse pictures, and even created threads whining about the the staff's decision when we had to pm them and remove their ava/sigs.

I was thinking about posting examples here, but i decided to remove them, because I think it's unnecessary to explain further