Ayus music today sounds more "dated" than her entire discography

[marty]

Originally Posted by ComatoseBunnySnatcher

Sorry sis but what is this? Why... and It was... have nothing in common but ellipsis in the title. Mid-tempos, but one is pop-rock and the other veers to R&B.

What, R&B Why...? Really?
Well, I really find them SO similar. And it's definetely not about the titles, lol. Mind you, I'm not an expert, like, at all. But I don't find Why... anywhere near R&B, I find it rockish. The same type of rockish It Was has, with the difference It Was was much better delivered. I think these two songs have the same kind of "flow" and atmosphere, if I make any sense.
What I know for sure is that when I listened the first time to Why... I immediately thought "Damn, It Was was such a better thing".

[ComatoseBunnySnatcher]

Originally Posted by marty

What, R&B Why...? Really?
Well, I really find them SO similar. And it's definetely not about the titles, lol. Mind you, I'm not an expert, like, at all. But I don't find Why... anywhere near R&B, I find it rockish. The same type of rockish It Was has, with the difference It Was was much better delivered. I think these two songs have the same kind of "flow" and atmosphere, if I make any sense.
What I know for sure is that when I listened the first time to Why... I immediately thought "Damn, It Was was such a better thing".

Lol, it is so not rockish. Why... has elements of R&B while being a pop ballad. It has guitars, but they don't define the song -iits based more on the strings used in it. It was really does have a rock based sound. They both are atmospheric, though. I think both songs attempt to deliver a nostalgic sense, but It was is superior in that sense.